Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has implemented a new rule restricting transgender women from using bathrooms in the Capitol that align with their gender identity. This decision has stirred controversy, becoming a major topic of discussion.
The policy, which Johnson shared in a public statement, covers all restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas in the Capitol and House office buildings. He noted that private and unisex restrooms are available for use, but the timeline for enacting the rule was not provided.
Speaker Johnson emphasizes biological definitions in divisive bathroom policy
As the Speaker of the House, Johnson holds the authority to regulate Capitol facilities, enabling him to enforce this measure. He declared that gender-specific spaces within the Capitol complex are intended for individuals based on their biological sex at birth. Johnson defended the move as a way to preserve spaces exclusively for women, emphasizing the importance of such designations.
The announcement coincided with Transgender Day of Remembrance, which honors victims of anti-trans violence, and comes shortly after Rep.-elect Sarah McBride (D-Del.) became the first openly transgender individual elected to Congress. Additionally, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) recently introduced legislation aiming to bar transgender women from using Capitol facilities corresponding to their gender identity.
McBride expressed disapproval of the policy but affirmed she would adhere to the rules. She emphasized her dedication to addressing critical issues for her constituents, such as reducing family expenses, rather than engaging in disputes over facility usage.
Earlier in the week, Johnson avoided questions about whether Mace’s proposal would be included in the upcoming House rules package. He underscored his belief in treating everyone with respect while reiterating his stance on biological definitions of sex.
Later, Johnson reiterated his position, asserting that biological distinctions between genders cannot be altered. While citing his religious beliefs, he stressed the importance of maintaining respect for all individuals despite these differences.
McBride criticized Mace’s bill as a distraction from pressing national issues, arguing that Congress should focus on making life more affordable for Americans rather than wading into cultural conflicts. She urged lawmakers to prioritize substantive solutions over divisive debates.
Mace, determined to advance her proposal, hinted at forcing a vote if the policy wasn’t incorporated into the House rules. Her arguments revolved around privacy concerns and discomfort in gender-specific spaces, fueling a broader conversation about identity and public policy in the Capitol.
