Political impeachment has long been a powerful tool for holding leaders accountable when they stray from the duties entrusted to them by the people. This process allows legislative bodies to formally accuse government officials, often presidents or judges, of serious misconduct.
The idea behind impeachment is to protect the integrity of governance by removing those who break the law or betray public trust. Throughout history, several countries have used impeachment as a way to address corruption, abuse of power, or other crimes committed by their leaders. Each case brings a unique story of political struggle, legal debates, and sometimes public unrest.

Early Beginnings of Impeachment
The concept of impeachment can be traced back to medieval England, where the Parliament sought methods to check the monarch’s power. This early form of political oversight was designed to ensure that even kings and nobles could not act without consequence.
In the 14th century, impeachment became a formal procedure, allowing the House of Commons to accuse officials and the House of Lords to judge them. This early system laid the foundation for modern impeachment processes seen in democratic countries today.
When the English Parliament developed impeachment, it was aimed at preserving the rule of law and preventing tyranny. Over time, this mechanism evolved from targeting royal servants and officers to being applicable to elected officials in republics around the world.
Impeachment in the United States
The United States adopted impeachment into its Constitution as a key part of the checks and balances among the branches of government. Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution makes clear that presidents, vice presidents, and all civil officers can be impeached for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” This phrase has been widely interpreted to cover a broad range of misconduct.
Since the nation’s founding, only a few presidents have faced impeachment proceedings. Andrew Johnson became the first president to be impeached in 1868, following conflicts with Congress during the Reconstruction era after the Civil War.
Johnson’s impeachment centered on his violation of the Tenure of Office Act by removing a cabinet member without Senate approval. Although the Senate fell one vote short of convicting him, the trial set important precedents for presidential accountability.
Decades later, Richard Nixon faced near-certain impeachment during the Watergate scandal. The revelations of illegal activities by his administration and efforts to cover them up led to the House Judiciary Committee recommending impeachment. However, Nixon resigned before the full House could vote, marking a rare case where resignation ended the impeachment process.
Bill Clinton also underwent impeachment in the late 1990s, accused of perjury and obstruction of justice related to his personal conduct. The Senate trial acquitted Clinton, allowing him to complete his term. These episodes demonstrated how impeachment in the United States balances political judgment with legal standards, often influenced by partisan divisions.
Impeachment Around the World
Several other countries have developed their own procedures for impeachment or similar removal processes for leaders. Brazil, for example, has seen multiple presidents impeached or pressured to resign in recent decades.
In 1992, President Fernando Collor de Mello faced impeachment following accusations of corruption, leading to his resignation before the Senate trial concluded. Similarly, Dilma Rousseff was impeached in 2016 over allegations of budget manipulation, a move that sparked widespread debate and protests.
South Korea has experienced an impeachment involving two presidents. Roh Moo-hyun was investigated but avoided impeachment, while Park Geun-hye was impeached and removed from office in 2017 due to a corruption scandal involving close aides. The Constitutional Court confirmed the removal, marking the first time a South Korean president was ousted by impeachment.
In the Philippines, impeachment has been employed several times to challenge sitting presidents and high officials. Joseph Estrada was impeached in 2000 over charges of corruption, but before the process was completed, mass protests forced his resignation. More recently, efforts to impeach presidents often stir political controversies and public demonstrations.
The Role of Impeachment in Democratic Governance
The mechanism of impeachment serves as a crucial check on those in power. By providing a formal method for addressing serious accusations against officials, it reinforces accountability and the rule of law. However, the process is rarely simple. Impeachment often involves intense political battles, where legal facts and political interests intermingle.

In many cases, impeachment proceedings divide legislatures and the public along partisan lines, making it difficult to reach consensus. The threat or initiation of impeachment can destabilize governments and sometimes lead to political unrest. Nonetheless, the existence of this process shows a commitment to the idea that no one is above the law, regardless of their position.
Challenges and Controversies
One of the biggest challenges with impeachment lies in its political nature. Even when evidence points to wrongdoing, political alliances and calculations often influence the outcome. In some countries, impeachment has been misused as a tool for political vendettas rather than genuine justice. This misuse can erode public trust in democratic institutions.
Another challenge is defining what constitutes impeachable offenses. The language in many constitutions leaves room for interpretation, causing disagreements over whether certain actions qualify as “high crimes” or misconduct. The ambiguity sometimes leads to prolonged legal debates and uncertain results.
Lessons From History
History shows that impeachment can be a double-edged sword. It provides a way to remove unfit leaders but can also be weaponised for political advantage. Successful use of impeachment requires careful adherence to legal standards and respect for democratic processes. Countries that have navigated these proceedings with transparency and fairness tend to maintain stronger democratic norms.
Political leaders and citizens alike benefit when impeachment is used responsibly as a safeguard for integrity and justice. Examining the history of political impeachments highlights the importance of this mechanism in defending democratic governance, while also cautioning against its potential abuse. It remains one of the most serious and consequential actions a legislature can take against those who hold the highest offices in government.