Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Jack Smith Resists News Media Attempt to Intervene in Trump Classified Documents Case

Credits: The Epoch Times

On February 5, special prosecutor Jack Smith’s office opposed a motion filed by a coalition comprising local and national news media, including The Associated Press, The New York Times, and NBC News. The coalition sought to intervene in the classified documents case involving former President Donald Trump in Florida.

The prosecutors contended that the Press Coalition lacked standing, asserting that their request to unseal specific court records, which could potentially benefit Trump’s defense, was already addressed by a previous motion from the defense. The Press Coalition submitted a request on January 22, seeking the court’s permission to participate in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Jack Smith (Credits: Bloomberg.com)

In response, Smith’s office, in its motion on February 5, formally opposed the Press Coalition’s request, stating that they failed to identify any statutory right to intervene in the case.

Prosecutors argued that the Press Coalition’s interest in the case was “ancillary to the main proceedings.” While acknowledging their pursuit of transparency and access to information, the prosecutors contended that this interest did not meet the standard for permissive intervention.

They further stated that such intervention was unnecessary as the court was already positioned to determine what information should remain sealed based on submissions from the parties and prevailing law.

President Trump had previously advocated for the unsealing of records in a motion filed on January 16, which Smith’s office had already responded to, supporting the unsealing with certain restrictions.

In their motion on January 18, prosecutors backed unsealing specific records with redactions. They proposed redacting identifying information and any details constituting Jencks Act material for any potential government witness mentioned in the defense’s motion.

The Press Coalition also urged the court to conduct an independent review of the proposed redactions to foster public confidence in the administration of justice.

Specifically, the coalition aimed to ensure that Smith’s office met its burden of demonstrating that the proposed redactions were narrowly tailored to serve the government’s legitimate interest in the integrity of the ongoing case and represented the least onerous alternative to sealing the entire set of records.

In response to this argument, prosecutors emphasized that they had already expressed in their response to Trump’s motion their full support for transparency in the record, consistent with considerations of witness safety, national security, and the court’s protective order.

Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We’re dedicated to providing you the most authenticated news. We’re working to turn our passion for the political industry into a booming online news portal.

You May Also Like

News

Spoilers! The demon Akaza from Kimetsu no Yaiba dies in the eleventh arc of the manga and the one responsible for his death is...

Entertainment

Actress Emma D’Arcy is from the British rebellion. She has only appeared in a small number of movies and TV shows. It might be...

Entertainment

Jennifer Coolidge Is Pregnant: Jennifer Coolidge Audrey Coolidge is a comedian and actress from the United States. Many of her followers are wondering if...

News

In the fiscal year 2022-23, Pakistan’s National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) granted a total of 1,596 net-metering licenses nationwide, collectively amounting to 221.05...